Data·Citizenan agentic layer over NYC Open Data
CatalogExploreAnalyticsMapAsk the agentFindingsGuideStatus
Data from NYC Open Data via the Socrata Discovery API. Quality scores are computed from a sample and are indicative, not authoritative.
← Catalog

OATH Trials Division Case Status

y3hw-z6bmCity Government16 columns
The OATH Trials Division dataset contains information about a diverse range of complex administrative law matters that are filed by city agencies, boards, and commissions and adjudicated by OATH Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, Trials Division. Such matters include civil service disciplinary and disability cases, city contract disputes, license revocation proceedings, prevailing wage proceedings, discrimination cases, loft law proceedings, Krimstock cases, where car owners seek return of vehicle seized during an arrest, campaign finance law and conflicts of interest law cases, alleged violations of consumer protection laws, and fair work week and paid sick leave laws. The Trials Division dataset includes those closed cases where litigants appear before the Trials Division for trial and where an OATH Administrative Law Judge has issued a decision. By law or by agency rule, the OATH ALJ issues final decisions in Krimstock cases, contract disputes and most cases brought by the Department of Consumer Affairs. In all other cases, the OATH ALJ issues a recommended decision which is subject to final action and determination by the filing agency's Agency Head. If an appeal is filed, the dataset provides the date of the appeal action that occurs after the final determination.
View on NYC Open Data↗

Quality

B84.7 / 100

From a 500-row sample across 15 columns.

completeness77/ 25% weight
consistency80/ 20% weight
accuracy77/ 20% weight
timeliness100/ 15% weight
usability95/ 20% weight

Related datasets

  • OATH Hearings Division Case Status0.41
  • Civil Service List (Terminated)0.34
  • Self Hauler Registrants0.32
  • BUILDING0.31
    joins onname
  • NYC Permitted Event Information0.30
  • Trade Waste Hauler Licensees0.30
  • NYC Zoning Tax Lot Database0.30
  • DSNY Monthly Tonnage Data

Sample rows

case_numbernametypecategorysubcategoryopenedoriginal_conferenceoriginal_trial_daterecord_closedreport_issueddispo_codefiling_agency_case_id
260790Mayor's Office of Special Enforcement v. Ahmed, Mafiz (05/20/2026)LicenseAdministrative CodeQ1 - License matters (other than TLC)2025-11-03T00:00:00.0002026-01-08T00:00:00.0002026-02-10T00:00:00.0002026-02-25T00:00:00.0002026-05-20T00:00:00.00051 - License Revoked

Columns

16 queryable · 16 profiled

The machine field names SoQL needs, with the publisher's own description of each.

FieldTypeDescriptionNullValues
filing_agency_case_idtextThe identifying number that belongs to the agency filing a case at OATH Trials Division16%SEE NOTESv5375006
case_numbertextOATH Case ID0%221748140377171036
nametextFull name of a case including petitioner's and/or respondent's names0%Taxi and Limousine Commi…Department of CorrectionNavesink Prestige LLC v.…
typecategoricalIndicates the type of case based on the categories of subject matter set by the Trials Division0%

Query this from your own app

GET /api/datasets/y3hw-z6bm
GET /api/datasets/y3hw-z6bm/quality
GET /api/datasets/y3hw-z6bm/related
GET /api/columns?dataset=y3hw-z6bm
0.30
—
232125Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2022LW013885
232122Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2020LW031282
232113Navensink Prestige v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2021LW000035
260850Mayor's Office of Special Enforcement v. Haque, Mafruha (05/20/2026)LicenseAdministrative CodeQ1 - License matters (other than TLC)2025-11-12T00:00:00.0002026-01-12T00:00:00.0002026-02-17T00:00:00.0002026-02-25T00:00:00.0002026-05-20T00:00:00.00051 - License Revoked—
232118Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2021LW002976
232114Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2021LW000037
232115Navensink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2020LW032012
232126Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2022LW013881
232123Navesink Prestige LLC v. Department of Design and Construction (12/01/2025)ContractContract Dispute Resolution BoardP4 - CD - Construction Contract2023-02-06T00:00:00.000——2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-12-01T00:00:00.00095 - CDRB-Claim DeniedADR2020LW031298

Showing 12 of 14 columns. All of them are listed below.

LicensePersonnelForfeitureof 7
categorycategoricalIdentifies categories of a case type based on the description of the subject matter0%Taxi & LimousineSection 75Forfeitureof 10
subcategorytextShort description of the primary charge brought by the filing agency1%04 - Fitness Drug UseX10 - Forefeiture - Vehi…BI - BIC
openeddatetimeThe date the case was officially opened at OATH Trials Division0%2023-02-06T00:00:00.0002024-03-08T00:00:00.0002023-03-13T00:00:00.000
original_conferencedatetimeInitial date the conference between parties in the case is scheduled81%2022-04-18T00:00:00.0002021-03-22T00:00:00.0002021-03-03T00:00:00.000
original_trial_datedatetimeInitial date the case is scheduled for trial25%2023-12-29T00:00:00.0002023-02-23T00:00:00.0002024-04-18T00:00:00.000
trial_concludeddatetimeThe date on which trial was concluded100%—
record_closeddatetimeAfter the close of the trial, the date on which all evidence, arguments and conclusions are submitted as final0%2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002025-06-12T00:00:00.0002022-07-12T00:00:00.000
premisesaddressThe subject location95%239 Banker Street, Brook…135 Kent Avenue, Brookly…100 Metropolitan Avenue,…
report_issueddatetimeThe date on which decision after the trial was issued0%2025-12-01T00:00:00.0002022-11-02T00:00:00.0002024-01-24T00:00:00.000
dispo_codetextDecision or outcome of the trial0%111 - License Revoked107 - Forfeiture -- Prop…128 - BIC -- Violation a…
agency_head_decisioncategoricalThe final determination made by the head of the filing agency after his or her review of ALJ's decision (report and recommendation)33%U - Recommendation uphel…N/AP - Upheld -- penalty mo…of 7
appeal_action_datedateThe date on which appeal was filed74%N/A2025-05-212021-07-09