Data·Citizenan agentic layer over NYC Open Data
CatalogExploreAnalyticsMapAsk the agentFindingsGuideStatus
Data from NYC Open Data via the Socrata Discovery API. Quality scores are computed from a sample and are indicative, not authoritative.
← Catalog

Zoning Application Portal (ZAP) - Project Data

hgx4-8ukbCity Government35 columns
The Department of City Planning (DCP) processes land use applications submitted by City or other public agencies and other (private) applicants. This data set provides information on land use applications, specifically the project tracking and description data related to approximately 30,000 projects since the late 1970s. ZAP project data appears on NYC Planning - Zoning Application Portal Search. It includes data migrated from the prior applications tracking system (LUCATS) and covers all projects that have been "Noticed" (that they will appear before the City Planning Commission in 30 or more days for Certification as complete for the ULURP process to begin) or Filed (a CEQR or Land Use application has been formally submitted to the Department for review) through completion (approval, disapproval, withdrawal, or termination). For more information on the land use and environmental review application process see: Application Process Overview You can explore this data in the Zoning Application Portal To report data errors or for questions, email zap_feedback_dl@planning.nyc.gov . All previously released versions of this data are available on the DCP Website: BYTES of the BIG APPLE . Current version: 20260706
View on NYC Open Data↗

Quality

B88.2 / 100

From a 500-row sample across 35 columns.

completeness67/ 25% weight
consistency89/ 20% weight
accuracy98/ 20% weight
timeliness95/ 15% weight
usability100/ 20% weight
  • · Has geographic keys — joinable to other NYC datasets

Related datasets

  • Zoning Application Portal (ZAP) - BBL0.70
    joins onproject_id
  • E-Designations0.34
  • Civil Service List (Terminated)0.33
  • Parking Violations Issued - Fiscal Year 20140.33
  • 2020 Census Tracts0.32
  • Parking Violations Issued - Fiscal Year 20270.32
  • CEQR Project Locations0.31
    joins on

Geography

Has borough codes (`borough`) — joinable, but needs boundary shapes to draw.

Sample rows

project_idproject_nameproject_briefproject_statuspublic_statusulurp_nonulurp_numbersprimary_applicantapplicant_typeboroughcommunity_districtcertified_referred
P1977X0531SAY CHEESECONSENT-UNENCL SIDEWALK CAFECompleteCompletedULURPC770207TCXDECUFFA, R & COHAN, MPrivateBronxX101977-08-08T00:00:00.000

Columns

35 queryable · 35 profiled

The machine field names SoQL needs, with the publisher's own description of each.

FieldTypeDescriptionNullValues
project_idtextUnique internal application identifier.0%P1981M0059P1983K1019P1985M0922
project_nametextName of application/project provided by the applicant.7%C-O-PDISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNE…SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPE…
project_brieftextDescription of the application and the development it will facilitate.2%DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNE…LDAUNRESTRICTED DISPOSITION…
project_statuscategoricalThis indicates whether the application is actively being worked on or not.0%

Query this from your own app

GET /api/datasets/hgx4-8ukb
GET /api/datasets/hgx4-8ukb/quality
GET /api/datasets/hgx4-8ukb/related
GET /api/columns?dataset=hgx4-8ukb
project_name
community_district
  • Primary Land Use Tax Lot Output (PLUTO)0.30
    joins onborough
    • 2026X03542 Ploughmans Bush SNADA SNAD Certification (ZR 105-41) to facilitate the construction of a deck on an existing Single family dwelling, is being sought by the private applicant, represented by Michael Goldblum Building Studio Architects, at 2 Ploughmans Bush in Riverdale, Community District 8, the Bronx.ActiveFiledNon-ULURP—Michael GoldblumPrivateBronxX08—
    P1984Y1090——Withdrawn-OtherCompleted——Unknown—Citywide—2011-01-31T00:00:00.000
    P1981Q0478107-06 150TH STLDAWithdrawn-OtherCompletedULURP—HPDOther Public AgencyQueensQ121981-05-26T00:00:00.000
    2026M0366301 E 71st Street Transit Easement CertificationA private application by 301 East 71 Investors LLC seeking a joint certification by the City Planning Commission and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority pursuant to ZR Section 95-041 to determine whether a transit easement volume is required for a zoning lot located at 301 East 71st Street in Manhattan Community District 8.ActiveFiledNon-ULURPN260302ZCM301 East 71 Investors LLCPrivateManhattanM08—
    2026M0312460 Tenth Avenue DIB CertificationA Chairperson certification pursuant to Section 93-31 of the Zoning Resolution to increase the maximum permitted FAR on the zoning lot consisting of Lots 66, 67, 68 and 70 on Manhattan Block 733 from 6.5 to 13.0 through a contribution to the Special Hudson Yards District Improvement Fund, is being sought by private applicant Sherwood 36 Associates, L.P. in connection with the development of a mixed use building at 460 Tenth Avenue in Hudson Yards, Community District 4, Manhattan.ActiveCompletedULURP260266ZCMJonathan SniderPrivateManhattanM042026-03-23T00:00:00.000
    2026M043231 West 52nd Street - Fogo de Chao OAC RenewalThis is a private application by Fogo de Chao W. 53rd Street requesting a chair certification pursuant to 37-73(c) to facilitate an open air café at 31 W. 52nd Street in Midtown, Manhattan CD 5. This will be the 3rd renewal, 4th Term.ActiveFiledNon-ULURPN260368ZCM; 260369LDMShaneka LeePrivateManhattanM05—
    P1977Q0013FOREST HILLS,DITMARS BLVDMODIFICATION TO BUS ROUTE, Q23Withdrawn-OtherCompletedULURP—TRIBORO COACH CORPPrivateQueensQ05,Q061977-01-17T00:00:00.000
    P1985K0400DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTYDISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY, 8 PARCELSCompleteCompletedULURPC850424PPKDRPOther Public AgencyBrooklynK031985-02-19T00:00:00.000
    P1985K0402426,640,798 GLENMORE AVE.DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY, 5 PARCELSCompleteCompletedULURPC850426PPKDRPOther Public AgencyBrooklynK051985-02-19T00:00:00.000

    Showing 12 of 28 columns. All of them are listed below.

    CompleteWithdrawn-OtherTerminatedof 7
    public_statuscategoricalThe public status of the application.0%CompletedFiledIn Public Reviewof 4
    ulurp_noncategoricalFlag that indicates if a project is subject to ULURP or not. Applications can either follow the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) or are designated as Non-ULURP, and are therefore not restricted to ULURP rules and timing.7%Non-ULURPULURPELURPof 3
    actionstextThe type of action(s) included in the application. There may be multiple land use actions attached to an application to facilitate a single development. Many action types on historical applications are retired.95%ZM; ZRZCRC
    ulurp_numberstextThe ULURP number is a unique identifier for each application's action. The first 2-characters (number) are the fiscal year the application was filed, followed by 4-character unique number, if an application was modified it will be followed by a 1-character (letter), followed by 2-character (letter) action code, followed by a 1-character (letter) borough code.15%C870526HAKN860877TCMN040031ZCM
    ceqr_typecategoricalIndicates the type of environmental review90%Type IIUnlistedType Iof 4
    ceqr_numbertextUnique environmental review identifier70%81-040R82-248K03DCP031M
    eas_eiscategoricalFlag that indicates the environmental review document issued. Environmental Assessment Statement (EAS), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Technical Memorandum (Tech Memo)97%EASEISTech Memoof 3
    ceqr_leadagencytextThe agency responsible for determining if an environmental review is required.85%DCPHPDLPC
    primary_applicanttextName of the project's primary applicant.0%DRPHPDLPC
    applicant_typecategoricalIndicates if the applicant is a private or public entity.6%PrivateOther Public AgencyDCPof 3
    boroughcategoricalBorough that is affected by the land use application.0%ManhattanStaten IslandBrooklynof 6
    community_districttextCommunity District(s) associated to the project6%R03M02M08
    cc_districtintegerCity Council District(s) associated to the project95%51350
    flood_zone_acategoricalFlag that indicates if project is in the 1% annual chance floodplain. Areas subject to the 1% annual chance flood (100 year flood) and are considered high-risk.87%falsetrueof 2
    flood_zone_shadedxcategoricalFlag that indicates if project is in the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. Areas subject to the 0.2% annual chance flood (500 year flood) and are considered moderate-risk.87%falsetrueof 2
    current_milestonetextThe current milestone related to the review of a land use application94%EAS - Project CompletedRC - Project CompletedZC - Project Completed
    current_milestone_datedatetimeThe start date of the current milestone related to the review of a land use application94%2022-10-11T00:00:00.0002019-06-05T00:00:00.0002019-09-30T00:00:00.000
    current_envmilestonetextThe current milestone related to the CEQR/environmental review of an application.99%EAS - Review Filed EASEAS - Prepare Filed EASEIS - Prepare and Review…
    current_envmilestone_datedatetimeThe start date of the current milestone related to the CEQR/environmental review of an application.99%2026-04-30T00:00:00.0002026-05-28T00:00:00.0002023-10-27T00:00:00.000
    app_filed_datedatetimeThe date an application(s) was filed with the Department of City Planning (DCP)96%2018-05-04T00:00:00.0002018-05-15T00:00:00.0002018-06-04T00:00:00.000
    noticed_datedatetimeThe date notice was given that an application will certify no sooner than 30 days per the City Charter requirement. This only applies to ULURP projects.99%2020-08-14T00:00:00.0002020-10-02T00:00:00.0002026-06-26T00:00:00.000
    certified_referreddatetimeThe date an application was certified or referred. This is also the official start of the ULURP process.3%2011-01-31T00:00:00.0001982-05-18T00:00:00.0001991-11-13T00:00:00.000
    approval_datedatetimeThe date an application was approved.97%2024-08-15T00:00:00.0002026-02-24T00:00:00.0002021-12-15T00:00:00.000
    completed_datedatetimeThe date the application processing was completed.9%1982-05-18T00:00:00.0001991-11-13T00:00:00.0001983-04-28T00:00:00.000
    mih_flagcategoricalFlag that indicates if Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) is proposed to be mapped through an amendment to the Zoning Resolution.95%falsetrueof 2
    mih_option1categoricalFlag that indicates MIH Option 1 is proposed to be mapped (25% Units/60% AMI)95%falsetrueof 2
    mih_option2categoricalFlag that indicates MIH Option 2 is proposed to be mapped (30% Units/80% AMI)95%FalseTrueof 2
    mih_workforcecategoricalFlag that indicates the MIH Workforce option is proposed to be mapped (30% Units/115% AMI)95%falsetrueof 2
    mih_deepaffordabilitycategoricalFlag that indicates the MIH Deep Affordability option is proposed to be mapped (20% Units/40% AMI)95%falsetrueof 2
    mih_mapped_no_rescategoricalFlag that indicates Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) is proposed to be mapped, but no residential units are proposed100%falsetrueof 2
    dcp_visibilitytext—0%General Publicof 1